1. Home
  2. Groups
  3. APT29

APT29

APT29 is threat group that has been attributed to Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).[1][2] They have operated since at least 2008, often targeting government networks in Europe and NATO member countries, research institutes, and think tanks. APT29 reportedly compromised the Democratic National Committee starting in the summer of 2015.[3][4][5][6]

In April 2021, the US and UK governments attributed the SolarWinds Compromise to the SVR; public statements included citations to APT29, Cozy Bear, and The Dukes.[7][8] Industry reporting also referred to the actors involved in this campaign as UNC2452, NOBELIUM, StellarParticle, Dark Halo, and SolarStorm.[9][10][11][12][13][14]

ID: G0016
ⓘ
Associated Groups: IRON RITUAL, IRON HEMLOCK, NobleBaron, Dark Halo, NOBELIUM, UNC2452, YTTRIUM, The Dukes, Cozy Bear, CozyDuke, SolarStorm, Blue Kitsune, UNC3524, Midnight Blizzard
Contributors: Daniyal Naeem, BT Security; Matt Brenton, Zurich Insurance Group; Katie Nickels, Red Canary; Joe Gumke, U.S. Bank; Liran Ravich, CardinalOps
Version: 6.1
Created: 31 May 2017
Last Modified: 03 September 2024
Version Permalink

Associated Group Descriptions

Name Description
IRON RITUAL

[15]
IRON HEMLOCK

[16]
NobleBaron

[17]
Dark Halo

[12]
NOBELIUM

[10][18][19][20]
UNC2452

[9]
YTTRIUM

[21]
The Dukes

[3][22][23][13]
Cozy Bear

[5][22][23][13][24]
CozyDuke

[5]
SolarStorm

[14]
Blue Kitsune

[25][26]
UNC3524

[27]
Midnight Blizzard

[28]

Campaigns

ID Name First Seen Last Seen References Techniques
C0023 Operation Ghost September 2013 [22] October 2019 [22]

[22]

 Acquire Infrastructure: Domains, Data Obfuscation: Steganography, Develop Capabilities: Malware, Establish Accounts: Social Media Accounts, Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription, Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography, Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts, Web Service: Bidirectional Communication
C0024 SolarWinds Compromise August 2019 [14] January 2021 [18]

[7][8][29]

 Account Discovery: Domain Account, Account Discovery, Account Manipulation: Additional Email Delegate Permissions, Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Roles, Account Manipulation: Device Registration, Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Credentials, Acquire Infrastructure: Domains, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Archive Collected Data: Archive via Utility, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Visual Basic, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Compromise Infrastructure: Domains, Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers, Credentials from Password Stores, Data from Information Repositories, Data from Information Repositories: Code Repositories, Data from Local System, Data Staged: Remote Data Staging, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Develop Capabilities: Malware, Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification, Domain Trust Discovery, Dynamic Resolution, Email Collection: Remote Email Collection, Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription, Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol, Exploit Public-Facing Application, External Remote Services, File and Directory Discovery, Forge Web Credentials: SAML Tokens, Forge Web Credentials: Web Cookies, Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials, Hide Infrastructure, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools, Impair Defenses: Disable Windows Event Logging, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify System Firewall, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Indicator Removal: Timestomp, Indicator Removal, Indicator Removal: Clear Mailbox Data, Ingress Tool Transfer, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Masquerading: Masquerade Task or Service, OS Credential Dumping: DCSync, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, Permission Groups Discovery, Process Discovery, Proxy: Internal Proxy, Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol, Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares, Remote Services: Windows Remote Management, Remote System Discovery, Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Kerberoasting, Steal Web Session Cookie, Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing, Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery: Internet Connection Discovery, Trusted Relationship, Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys, Use Alternate Authentication Material, Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token, Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie, Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts, Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts, Valid Accounts: Local Accounts, Valid Accounts, Windows Management Instrumentation
Enterprise Layer
download view

Techniques Used

Domain ID Name Use
Enterprise T1548 .002 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control

APT29 has bypassed UAC.[30]
Enterprise T1087 .002 Account Discovery: Domain Account

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used PowerShell to discover domain accounts by exectuing Get-ADUser and Get-ADGroupMember.[24][15]
.004 Account Discovery: Cloud Account

APT29 has conducted enumeration of Azure AD accounts.[31]
Enterprise T1098 .001 Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Credentials

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 added credentials to OAuth Applications and Service Principals.[32][24]
.002 Account Manipulation: Additional Email Delegate Permissions

APT29 has used a compromised global administrator account in Azure AD to backdoor a service principal with ApplicationImpersonation rights to start collecting emails from targeted mailboxes; APT29 has also used compromised accounts holding ApplicationImpersonation rights in Exchange to collect emails.[33][27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 added their own devices as allowed IDs for active sync using Set-CASMailbox, allowing it to obtain copies of victim mailboxes. It also added additional permissions (such as Mail.Read and Mail.ReadWrite) to compromised Application or Service Principals.[12][32][31]
.003 Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Roles

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 granted company administrator privileges to a newly created service principle.[24]
.005 Account Manipulation: Device Registration

APT29 has enrolled their own devices into compromised cloud tenants, including enrolling a device in MFA to an Azure AD environment following a successful password guessing attack against a dormant account.[33][34]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 registered devices in order to enable mailbox syncing via the Set-CASMailbox command.[12]
Enterprise T1583 .001 Acquire Infrastructure: Domains

For the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 acquired C2 domains, sometimes through resellers.[10][35]

For Operation Ghost, APT29 registered domains for use in C2 including some crafted to appear as existing legitimate domains.[22]
.006 Acquire Infrastructure: Web Services

APT29 has registered algorithmically generated Twitter handles that are used for C2 by malware, such as HAMMERTOSS. APT29 has also used legitimate web services such as Dropbox and Constant Contact in their operations.[36][18]
Enterprise T1595 .002 Active Scanning: Vulnerability Scanning

APT29 has conducted widespread scanning of target environments to identify vulnerabilities for exploit.[13]
Enterprise T1071 .001 Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used HTTP for C2 and data exfiltration.[12]
Enterprise T1560 .001 Archive Collected Data: Archive via Utility

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used 7-Zip to compress stolen emails into password-protected archives prior to exfltration; APT29 also compressed text files into zipped archives.[12][37][24]
Enterprise T1547 .001 Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder

APT29 added Registry Run keys to establish persistence.[30]
Enterprise T1037 Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts

APT29 has hijacked legitimate application-specific startup scripts to enable malware to execute on system startup.[27]
.004 RC Scripts

APT29 has installed a run command on a compromised system to enable malware execution on system startup.[27]
Enterprise T1110 .001 Brute Force: Password Guessing

APT29 has successfully conducted password guessing attacks against a list of mailboxes.[33]
.003 Brute Force: Password Spraying

APT29 has conducted brute force password spray attacks.[20][31][34]
Enterprise T1651 Cloud Administration Command

APT29 has used Azure Run Command and Azure Admin-on-Behalf-of (AOBO) to execute code on virtual machines.[31]
Enterprise T1059 .001 Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell

APT29 has used encoded PowerShell scripts uploaded to CozyCar installations to download and install SeaDuke.[38][30][39][16]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used PowerShell to create new tasks on remote machines, identify configuration settings, exfiltrate data, and execute other commands.[12][40][24]
.003 Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used cmd.exe to execute commands on remote machines.[12][40]
.005 Command and Scripting Interpreter: Visual Basic

For the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 wrote malware such as Sibot in Visual Basic.[13]
.006 Command and Scripting Interpreter: Python

APT29 has developed malware variants written in Python.[38]
.009 Command and Scripting Interpreter: Cloud API

APT29 has leveraged the Microsoft Graph API to perform various actions across Azure and M365 environments. They have also utilized AADInternals PowerShell Modules to access the API [19]
Enterprise T1586 .002 Compromise Accounts: Email Accounts

APT29 has compromised email accounts to further enable phishing campaigns and taken control of dormant accounts.[41][33]
.003 Compromise Accounts: Cloud Accounts

APT29 has used residential proxies, including Azure Virtual Machines, to obfuscate their access to victim environments.[33]
Enterprise T1584 .001 Compromise Infrastructure: Domains

For the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 compromised domains to use for C2.[10]
Enterprise T1136 .003 Create Account: Cloud Account

APT29 can create new users through Azure AD.[31]
Enterprise T1555 .003 Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 stole users' saved passwords from Chrome.[24]
Enterprise T1213 Data from Information Repositories

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 accessed victims' internal knowledge repositories (wikis) to view sensitive corporate information on products, services, and internal business operations.[24]
.003 Code Repositories

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 downloaded source code from code repositories.[42]
Enterprise T1005 Data from Local System

APT29 has stolen data from compromised hosts.[27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 extracted files from compromised networks.[12]
Enterprise T1001 .002 Data Obfuscation: Steganography

During Operation Ghost, APT29 used steganography to hide the communications between the implants and their C&C servers.[22]
Enterprise T1074 .002 Data Staged: Remote Data Staging

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 staged data and files in password-protected archives on a victim's OWA server.[12]
Enterprise T1140 Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used 7-Zip to decode their Raindrop malware.[43]
Enterprise T1587 .001 Develop Capabilities: Malware

APT29 has used unique malware in many of their operations.[3][30][19][27]

For the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used numerous pieces of malware that were likely developed for or by the group, including SUNBURST, SUNSPOT, Raindrop, and TEARDROP.[9][11][37]

For Operation Ghost, APT29 used new strains of malware including FatDuke, MiniDuke, RegDuke, and PolyglotDuke.[22]
.003 Develop Capabilities: Digital Certificates

APT29 has created self-signed digital certificates to enable mutual TLS authentication for malware.[25][26]
Enterprise T1484 .002 Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 changed domain federation trust settings using Azure AD administrative permissions to configure the domain to accept authorization tokens signed by their own SAML signing certificate.[15][44]
Enterprise T1482 Domain Trust Discovery

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used the Get-AcceptedDomain PowerShell cmdlet to enumerate accepted domains through an Exchange Management Shell.[12] They also used AdFind to enumerate domains and to discover trust between federated domains.[24][37]
Enterprise T1568 Dynamic Resolution

APT29 has used Dynamic DNS providers for their malware C2 infrastructure.[27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used dynamic DNS resolution to construct and resolve to randomly-generated subdomains for C2.[12]

Enterprise T1114 .002 Email Collection: Remote Email Collection

APT29 has collected emails from targeted mailboxes within a compromised Azure AD tenant and compromised Exchange servers, including via Exchange Web Services (EWS) API requests.[33][27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 collected emails from specific individuals, such as executives and IT staff, using New-MailboxExportRequest followed by Get-MailboxExportRequest.[12][13]
Enterprise T1573 Encrypted Channel

APT29 has used multiple layers of encryption within malware to protect C2 communication.[16]
Enterprise T1585 .001 Establish Accounts: Social Media Accounts

For Operation Ghost, APT29 registered Twitter accounts to host C2 nodes.[22]
Enterprise T1546 .003 Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription

APT29 has used WMI event subscriptions for persistence.[30]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used a WMI event filter to invoke a command-line event consumer at system boot time to launch a backdoor with rundll32.exe.[37][44]

During Operation Ghost, APT29 used WMI event subscriptions to establish persistence for malware.[22]
.008 Event Triggered Execution: Accessibility Features

APT29 used sticky-keys to obtain unauthenticated, privileged console access.[30][45]
Enterprise T1048 .002 Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 exfiltrated collected data over a simple HTTPS request to a password-protected archive staged on a victim's OWA servers.[12]
Enterprise T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application

APT29 has exploited CVE-2019-19781 for Citrix, CVE-2019-11510 for Pulse Secure VPNs, CVE-2018-13379 for FortiGate VPNs, and CVE-2019-9670 in Zimbra software to gain access.[13][23]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 exploited CVE-2020-0688 against the Microsoft Exchange Control Panel to regain access to a network.[12][13]
Enterprise T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution

APT29 has used multiple software exploits for common client software, like Microsoft Word, Exchange, and Adobe Reader, to gain code execution.[3][13][18]
Enterprise T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation

APT29 has exploited CVE-2021-36934 to escalate privileges on a compromised host.[39]
Enterprise T1133 External Remote Services

APT29 has used compromised identities to access networks via VPNs and Citrix.[23][33]

For the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used compromised identities to access networks via SSH, VPNs, and other remote access tools.[10][24]
Enterprise T1083 File and Directory Discovery

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 obtained information about the configured Exchange virtual directory using Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory.[12]
Enterprise T1606 .001 Forge Web Credentials: Web Cookies

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 bypassed MFA set on OWA accounts by generating a cookie value from a previously stolen secret key.[12]
.002 Forge Web Credentials: SAML Tokens

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 created tokens using compromised SAML signing certificates.[32][15]
Enterprise T1589 .001 Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials

For the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 conducted credential theft operations to obtain credentials to be used for access to victim environments.[24]
Enterprise T1665 Hide Infrastructure

APT29 uses compromised residential endpoints, typically within the same ISP IP address range, as proxies to hide the true source of C2 traffic.[34]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 set the hostnames of their C2 infrastructure to match legitimate hostnames in the victim environment. They also used IP addresses originating from the same country as the victim for their VPN infrastructure.[9]
Enterprise T1562 .001 Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used the service control manager on a remote system to disable services associated with security monitoring products.[37]
.002 Impair Defenses: Disable Windows Event Logging

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29, used AUDITPOL to prevent the collection of audit logs.[37]
.004 Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify System Firewall

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used netsh to configure firewall rules that limited certain UDP outbound packets.[37]
.008 Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Cloud Logs

APT29 has disabled Purview Audit on targeted accounts prior to stealing emails from Microsoft 365 tenants.[33]
Enterprise T1070 .004 Indicator Removal: File Deletion

APT29 has used SDelete to remove artifacts from victim networks.[30]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 routinely removed their tools, including custom backdoors, once remote access was achieved.[9]
.006 Indicator Removal: Timestomp

APT29 has used timestomping to alter the Standard Information timestamps on their web shells to match other files in the same directory.[27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 modified timestamps of backdoors to match legitimate Windows files.[37]
.008 Indicator Removal: Clear Mailbox Data

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 removed evidence of email export requests using Remove-MailboxExportRequest.[12]
Enterprise T1105 Ingress Tool Transfer

APT29 has downloaded additional tools and malware onto compromised networks.[30][25][3][27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 downloaded additional malware, such as TEARDROP and Cobalt Strike, onto a compromised host following initial access.[9]
Enterprise T1036 .004 Masquerading: Masquerade Task or Service

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 named tasks \Microsoft\Windows\SoftwareProtectionPlatform\EventCacheManager in order to appear legitimate.[12]
.005 Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location

APT29 has renamed malicious DLLs with legitimate names to appear benign; they have also created an Azure AD certificate with a Common Name that matched the display name of the compromised service principal.[17][33]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 renamed software and DLLs with legitimate names to appear benign.[12][40]
Enterprise T1556 .007 Modify Authentication Process: Hybrid Identity

APT29 has edited the Microsoft.IdentityServer.Servicehost.exe.config file to load a malicious DLL into the AD FS process, thereby enabling persistent access to any service federated with AD FS for a user with a specified User Principal Name.[46]
Enterprise T1621 Multi-Factor Authentication Request Generation

APT29 has used repeated MFA requests to gain access to victim accounts.[47][34]
Enterprise T1027 .001 Obfuscated Files or Information: Binary Padding

APT29 used large size files to avoid detection by security solutions with hardcoded size limits.[17]
.002 Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing

APT29 used UPX to pack files.[30]
.003 Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography

During Operation Ghost, APT29 used steganography to hide payloads inside valid images.[22]
.006 Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML Smuggling

APT29 has embedded an ISO file within an HTML attachment that contained JavaScript code to initiate malware execution.[39]

Enterprise T1588 .002 Obtain Capabilities: Tool

APT29 has obtained and used a variety of tools including Mimikatz, SDelete, Tor, meek, and Cobalt Strike.[30][3][27]
Enterprise T1003 .002 OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager

APT29 has used the reg save command to save registry hives.[27]
.004 OS Credential Dumping: LSA Secrets

APT29 has used the reg save command to extract LSA secrets offline.[27]
.006 OS Credential Dumping: DCSync

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used privileged accounts to replicate directory service data with domain controllers.[44][37][24]
Enterprise T1069 .002 Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used AdFind to enumerate domain groups.[24]
Enterprise T1566 .001 Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment

APT29 has used spearphishing emails with an attachment to deliver files with exploits to initial victims.[3][18][39][16]
.002 Phishing: Spearphishing Link

APT29 has used spearphishing with a link to trick victims into clicking on a link to a zip file containing malicious files.[30][18][48]
.003 Phishing: Spearphishing via Service

APT29 has used the legitimate mailing service Constant Contact to send phishing e-mails.[18]
Enterprise T1057 Process Discovery

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used multiple command-line utilities to enumerate running processes.[12][37][24]
Enterprise T1090 .001 Proxy: Internal Proxy

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used SSH port forwarding capabilities on public-facing systems, and configured at least one instance of Cobalt Strike to use a network pipe over SMB.[24][43]
.002 Proxy: External Proxy

APT29 uses compromised residential endpoints as proxies for defense evasion and network access.[34]
.003 Proxy: Multi-hop Proxy

A backdoor used by APT29 created a Tor hidden service to forward traffic from the Tor client to local ports 3389 (RDP), 139 (Netbios), and 445 (SMB) enabling full remote access from outside the network and has also used TOR.[30][31]
.004 Proxy: Domain Fronting

APT29 has used the meek domain fronting plugin for Tor to hide the destination of C2 traffic.[30]
Enterprise T1021 .001 Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used RDP sessions from public-facing systems to internal servers.[24]
.002 Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used administrative accounts to connect over SMB to targeted users.[24]
.006 Remote Services: Windows Remote Management

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used WinRM via PowerShell to execute commands and payloads on remote hosts.[43]
.007 Remote Services: Cloud Services

APT29 has leveraged compromised high-privileged on-premises accounts synced to Office 365 to move laterally into a cloud environment, including through the use of Azure AD PowerShell.[49]
Enterprise T1018 Remote System Discovery

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used AdFind to enumerate remote systems.[37]
Enterprise T1053 .005 Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task

APT29 has used named and hijacked scheduled tasks to establish persistence.[30]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used scheduler and schtasks to create new tasks on remote host as part of their lateral movement. They manipulated scheduled tasks by updating an existing legitimate task to execute their tools and then returned the scheduled task to its original configuration. APT29 also created a scheduled task to maintain SUNSPOT persistence when the host booted.[12][9][11]
Enterprise T1505 .003 Server Software Component: Web Shell

APT29 has installed web shells on exploited Microsoft Exchange servers.[13][27]
Enterprise T1528 Steal Application Access Token

APT29 uses stolen tokens to access victim accounts, without needing a password.[34]
Enterprise T1649 Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates

APT29 has abused misconfigured AD CS certificate templates to impersonate admin users and create additional authentication certificates.[50]
Enterprise T1558 .003 Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Kerberoasting

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 obtained Ticket Granting Service (TGS) tickets for Active Directory Service Principle Names to crack offline.[37]
Enterprise T1539 Steal Web Session Cookie

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 stole Chrome browser cookies by copying the Chrome profile directories of targeted users.[24]
Enterprise T1553 .002 Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 was able to get SUNBURST signed by SolarWinds code signing certificates by injecting the malware into the SolarWinds Orion software lifecycle.[9]
.005 Subvert Trust Controls: Mark-of-the-Web Bypass

APT29 has embedded ISO images and VHDX files in HTML to evade Mark-of-the-Web.[39]
Enterprise T1195 .002 Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 gained initial network access to some victims via a trojanized update of SolarWinds Orion software.[51][9][13][37]
Enterprise T1218 .005 System Binary Proxy Execution: Mshta

APT29 has use mshta to execute malicious scripts on a compromised host.[39]
.011 System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used Rundll32.exe to execute payloads.[32][37]
Enterprise T1082 System Information Discovery

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used fsutil to check available free space before executing actions that might create large files on disk.[37]
Enterprise T1016 .001 System Network Configuration Discovery: Internet Connection Discovery

APT29 has ensured web servers in a victim environment are Internet accessible before copying tools or malware to it.[27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used GoldFinder to perform HTTP GET requests to check internet connectivity and identify HTTP proxy servers and other redirectors that an HTTP request travels through.[10]
Enterprise T1199 Trusted Relationship

APT29 has compromised IT, cloud services, and managed services providers to gain broad access to multiple customers for subsequent operations.[31]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 gained access through compromised accounts at cloud solution partners, and used compromised certificates issued by Mimecast to authenticate to Mimecast customer systems.[13][24]
Enterprise T1552 .004 Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 obtained PKI keys, certificate files, and the private encryption key from an Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) container to decrypt corresponding SAML signing certificates.[44][13]
Enterprise T1550 .001 Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used compromised service principals to make changes to the Office 365 environment.[24]
.003 Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Ticket

APT29 used Kerberos ticket attacks for lateral movement.[30]
.004 Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used stolen cookies to access cloud resources and a forged duo-sid cookie to bypass MFA set on an email account.[12][24]
Enterprise T1204 .001 User Execution: Malicious Link

APT29 has used various forms of spearphishing attempting to get a user to click on a malicious link.[18][48]
.002 User Execution: Malicious File

APT29 has used various forms of spearphishing attempting to get a user to open attachments, including, but not limited to, malicious Microsoft Word documents, .pdf, and .lnk files. [3][39][16]
Enterprise T1078 Valid Accounts

APT29 has used a compromised account to access an organization's VPN infrastructure.[33]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used different compromised credentials for remote access and to move laterally.[9][10][13]
.002 Domain Accounts

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used domain administrators' accounts to help facilitate lateral movement on compromised networks.[24]

For Operation Ghost, APT29 used stolen administrator credentials for lateral movement on compromised networks.[22]
.003 Local Accounts

APT29 targets dormant or inactive user accounts, accounts belonging to individuals no longer at the organization but whose accounts remain on the system, for access and persistence.[34]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used compromised local accounts to access victims' networks.[24]
.004 Cloud Accounts

APT29 has gained access to a global administrator account in Azure AD and has used Service Principal credentials in Exchange.[33][27]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used a compromised O365 administrator account to create a new Service Principal.[24]
Enterprise T1102 .002 Web Service: Bidirectional Communication

For Operation Ghost, APT29 used social media platforms to hide communications to C2 servers.[22]
Enterprise T1047 Windows Management Instrumentation

APT29 used WMI to steal credentials and execute backdoors at a future time.[30]

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used WMI for the remote execution of files for lateral movement.[44][37]

Software

ID Name References Techniques
S0677 AADInternals [31] Account Discovery: Cloud Account, Account Manipulation: Device Registration, Cloud Administration Command, Cloud Service Discovery, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Create Account: Cloud Account, Data from Cloud Storage, Domain or Tenant Policy Modification: Trust Modification, Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol, Forge Web Credentials: SAML Tokens, Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses, Gather Victim Network Information: Domain Properties, Modify Authentication Process: Hybrid Identity, Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication, Modify Registry, OS Credential Dumping: LSA Secrets, Permission Groups Discovery: Cloud Groups, Phishing: Spearphishing Link, Phishing for Information: Spearphishing Link, Steal Application Access Token, Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates, Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Silver Ticket, Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files, Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys
S0552 AdFind [40][24][39] Account Discovery: Domain Account, Domain Trust Discovery, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, Remote System Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery
S0521 BloodHound [39] Account Discovery: Domain Account, Account Discovery: Local Account, Archive Collected Data, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Domain Trust Discovery, Group Policy Discovery, Native API, Password Policy Discovery, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, Permission Groups Discovery: Local Groups, Remote System Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery
S0635 BoomBox [19] Account Discovery: Domain Account, Account Discovery: Email Account, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Execution Guardrails, Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage, File and Directory Discovery, Ingress Tool Transfer, Masquerading, Obfuscated Files or Information, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery, User Execution: Malicious File, Web Service
S0054 CloudDuke [3] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Ingress Tool Transfer, Web Service: Bidirectional Communication
S0154 Cobalt Strike [9][13][18][19][17][39][15][48] Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Sudo and Sudo Caching, Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control, Access Token Manipulation: Parent PID Spoofing, Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft, Access Token Manipulation: Make and Impersonate Token, Account Discovery: Domain Account, Application Layer Protocol: DNS, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Application Layer Protocol: File Transfer Protocols, BITS Jobs, Browser Session Hijacking, Command and Scripting Interpreter: JavaScript, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Visual Basic, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Python, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service, Data Encoding: Standard Encoding, Data from Local System, Data Obfuscation: Protocol or Service Impersonation, Data Transfer Size Limits, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Exploitation for Client Execution, Exploitation for Privilege Escalation, File and Directory Discovery, Hide Artifacts: Process Argument Spoofing, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools, Indicator Removal: Timestomp, Ingress Tool Transfer, Input Capture: Keylogging, Modify Registry, Native API, Network Service Discovery, Network Share Discovery, Non-Application Layer Protocol, Obfuscated Files or Information: Indicator Removal from Tools, Obfuscated Files or Information, Office Application Startup: Office Template Macros, OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory, OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, Permission Groups Discovery: Local Groups, Process Discovery, Process Injection: Dynamic-link Library Injection, Process Injection: Process Hollowing, Process Injection, Protocol Tunneling, Proxy: Domain Fronting, Proxy: Internal Proxy, Query Registry, Reflective Code Loading, Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol, Remote Services: SSH, Remote Services: Windows Remote Management, Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares, Remote Services: Distributed Component Object Model, Remote System Discovery, Scheduled Transfer, Screen Capture, Software Discovery, Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Network Connections Discovery, System Service Discovery, System Services: Service Execution, Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Hash, Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts, Valid Accounts: Local Accounts, Windows Management Instrumentation
S0050 CosmicDuke [3][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Automated Exfiltration, Clipboard Data, Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service, Credentials from Password Stores, Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers, Data from Local System, Data from Network Shared Drive, Data from Removable Media, Email Collection: Local Email Collection, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol, Exploitation for Privilege Escalation, File and Directory Discovery, Input Capture: Keylogging, OS Credential Dumping: LSA Secrets, OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager, Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, Screen Capture
S0046 CozyCar [3][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service, Masquerading: Rename System Utilities, Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File, OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory, OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager, Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, Software Discovery: Security Software Discovery, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion, Web Service: Bidirectional Communication
S0634 EnvyScout [19] Command and Scripting Interpreter: JavaScript, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Data from Local System, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Execution Guardrails, Forced Authentication, Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories, Masquerading, Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File, Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML Smuggling, Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, User Execution: Malicious File
S0512 FatDuke [22][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Data from Local System, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Fallback Channels, File and Directory Discovery, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Masquerading, Native API, Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing, Obfuscated Files or Information, Obfuscated Files or Information: Binary Padding, Process Discovery, Proxy: Internal Proxy, Query Registry, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion
S0661 FoggyWeb [52] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Archive Collected Data: Archive via Custom Method, Archive Collected Data: Archive via Library, Data from Local System, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Exfiltration Over C2 Channel, File and Directory Discovery, Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Search Order Hijacking, Ingress Tool Transfer, Masquerading, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Native API, Network Sniffing, Obfuscated Files or Information: Compile After Delivery, Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File, Process Discovery, Reflective Code Loading, Shared Modules, Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys, Use Alternate Authentication Material
S0049 GeminiDuke [3] Account Discovery: Local Account, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, File and Directory Discovery, Process Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Service Discovery
S0597 GoldFinder [10][13][19][15] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Automated Collection, System Network Configuration Discovery: Internet Connection Discovery
S0588 GoldMax [10][13][18][19][15] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Data Obfuscation: Junk Data, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Exfiltration Over C2 Channel, Hide Artifacts: Ignore Process Interrupts, Ingress Tool Transfer, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Masquerading: Masquerade Task or Service, Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing, Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File, Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, Scheduled Task/Job: Cron, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Time Discovery, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: System Checks
S0037 HAMMERTOSS [3][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Data Obfuscation: Steganography, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage, Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window, Web Service: One-Way Communication
S0357 Impacket [27] Adversary-in-the-Middle: LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay, Network Sniffing, OS Credential Dumping: NTDS, OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory, OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager, OS Credential Dumping: LSA Secrets, Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Kerberoasting, Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Ccache Files, System Services: Service Execution, Windows Management Instrumentation
S0100 ipconfig [53] System Network Configuration Discovery
S0513 LiteDuke [22][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography, Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing, Query Registry, Software Discovery: Security Software Discovery, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion
S0175 meek [30] Proxy: Domain Fronting
S0002 Mimikatz [3][44][24] Access Token Manipulation: SID-History Injection, Account Manipulation, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Security Support Provider, Credentials from Password Stores, Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers, Credentials from Password Stores: Windows Credential Manager, OS Credential Dumping: DCSync, OS Credential Dumping: Security Account Manager, OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory, OS Credential Dumping: LSA Secrets, Rogue Domain Controller, Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates, Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Golden Ticket, Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Silver Ticket, Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys, Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Hash, Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Ticket
S0051 MiniDuke [3][22][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Dynamic Resolution: Domain Generation Algorithms, Fallback Channels, File and Directory Discovery, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information, Proxy: Internal Proxy, System Information Discovery, Web Service: Dead Drop Resolver
S0637 NativeZone [17] Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Execution Guardrails, Masquerading, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, User Execution: Malicious File, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: System Checks
S0039 Net [53] Account Discovery: Domain Account, Account Discovery: Local Account, Account Manipulation: Additional Local or Domain Groups, Create Account: Local Account, Create Account: Domain Account, Indicator Removal: Network Share Connection Removal, Network Share Discovery, Password Policy Discovery, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, Permission Groups Discovery: Local Groups, Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares, Remote System Discovery, System Network Connections Discovery, System Service Discovery, System Services: Service Execution, System Time Discovery
S0052 OnionDuke [3][22][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Endpoint Denial of Service, OS Credential Dumping, Web Service: One-Way Communication
S0048 PinchDuke [3] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Credentials from Password Stores, Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers, Data from Local System, File and Directory Discovery, OS Credential Dumping, System Information Discovery
S0518 PolyglotDuke [22][16] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Ingress Tool Transfer, Modify Registry, Native API, Obfuscated Files or Information, Obfuscated Files or Information: Fileless Storage, Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, Web Service: Dead Drop Resolver
S0150 POSHSPY [54] Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Data Transfer Size Limits, Dynamic Resolution: Domain Generation Algorithms, Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription, Indicator Removal: Timestomp, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information
S0139 PowerDuke [55] Application Window Discovery, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Data Destruction, File and Directory Discovery, Hide Artifacts: NTFS File Attributes, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography, Process Discovery, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery, System Time Discovery
S0029 PsExec [3][22] Create Account: Domain Account, Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service, Lateral Tool Transfer, Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares, System Services: Service Execution
S1084 QUIETEXIT [27] Application Layer Protocol, Fallback Channels, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Non-Application Layer Protocol, Proxy: External Proxy
S0565 Raindrop [43][19][15] Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Masquerading, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File, Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing, Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion
S0511 RegDuke [22][16] Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription, Ingress Tool Transfer, Modify Registry, Obfuscated Files or Information: Steganography, Obfuscated Files or Information: Fileless Storage, Obfuscated Files or Information, Web Service: Bidirectional Communication
S0684 ROADTools [31] Account Discovery: Cloud Account, Automated Collection, Cloud Service Discovery, Permission Groups Discovery: Cloud Groups, Remote System Discovery, Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts
S0195 SDelete [30] Data Destruction, Indicator Removal: File Deletion
S0053 SeaDuke [3][16][38] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Archive Collected Data: Archive via Library, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Shortcut Modification, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Data Encoding: Standard Encoding, Email Collection: Remote Email Collection, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information: Software Packing, Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Ticket, Valid Accounts
S0589 Sibot [10][13][19][15] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Visual Basic, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Indicator Removal, Ingress Tool Transfer, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Modify Registry, Obfuscated Files or Information: Command Obfuscation, Obfuscated Files or Information: Fileless Storage, Query Registry, Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, System Binary Proxy Execution: Mshta, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Network Connections Discovery, Web Service, Windows Management Instrumentation
S0633 Sliver [13][16] Access Token Manipulation, Application Layer Protocol: DNS, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Data Encoding: Standard Encoding, Data Obfuscation: Steganography, Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Exfiltration Over C2 Channel, File and Directory Discovery, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File, Process Injection, Screen Capture, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Network Connections Discovery
S0516 SoreFang [23][53] Account Discovery: Domain Account, Account Discovery: Local Account, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Exploit Public-Facing Application, File and Directory Discovery, Ingress Tool Transfer, Obfuscated Files or Information, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, Process Discovery, Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery
S0559 SUNBURST [9][18][15] Application Layer Protocol: DNS, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Visual Basic, Data Encoding: Standard Encoding, Data from Local System, Data Obfuscation: Protocol or Service Impersonation, Data Obfuscation: Junk Data, Data Obfuscation: Steganography, Dynamic Resolution, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Event Triggered Execution: Image File Execution Options Injection, File and Directory Discovery, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools, Indicator Removal: Clear Persistence, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Indicator Removal: Clear Network Connection History and Configurations, Indicator Removal, Ingress Tool Transfer, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Modify Registry, Obfuscated Files or Information, Obfuscated Files or Information: Indicator Removal from Tools, Process Discovery, Query Registry, Software Discovery: Security Software Discovery, Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing, System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery, System Service Discovery, System Time Discovery, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion, Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: System Checks, Windows Management Instrumentation
S0562 SUNSPOT [11][19] Access Token Manipulation, Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Execution Guardrails, Execution Guardrails: Mutual Exclusion, File and Directory Discovery, Indicator Removal: File Deletion, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Native API, Obfuscated Files or Information, Process Discovery, Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain
S0096 Systeminfo [53] System Information Discovery
S0057 Tasklist [53] Process Discovery, Software Discovery: Security Software Discovery, System Service Discovery
S0560 TEARDROP [9][18][19][15] Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, Modify Registry, Obfuscated Files or Information, Query Registry
S0183 Tor [30] Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Proxy: Multi-hop Proxy
S0682 TrailBlazer [24] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Data Obfuscation: Junk Data, Data Obfuscation, Event Triggered Execution: Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription, Masquerading
S0636 VaporRage [19] Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Execution Guardrails, Ingress Tool Transfer
S0515 WellMail [56][23][13] Archive Collected Data, Data from Local System, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Ingress Tool Transfer, Non-Application Layer Protocol, Non-Standard Port, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery
S0514 WellMess [25][26][57][23][13] Application Layer Protocol: DNS, Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols, Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, Data Encoding: Standard Encoding, Data from Local System, Data Obfuscation: Junk Data, Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information, Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography, Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography, Ingress Tool Transfer, Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups, System Information Discovery, System Network Configuration Discovery, System Owner/User Discovery

References

  1. White House. (2021, April 15). Imposing Costs for Harmful Foreign Activities by the Russian Government. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  2. UK Gov. (2021, April 15). UK and US expose global campaign of malign activity by Russian intelligence services . Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  3. F-Secure Labs. (2015, September 17). The Dukes: 7 years of Russian cyberespionage. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  4. Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2016, December 29). GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  5. Alperovitch, D.. (2016, June 15). Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee. Retrieved August 3, 2016.
  6. UK Gov. (2021, April 15). UK exposes Russian involvement in SolarWinds cyber compromise . Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  7. NSA, FBI, DHS. (2021, April 15). Russian SVR Targets U.S. and Allied Networks. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  8. UK NCSC. (2021, April 15). UK and US call out Russia for SolarWinds compromise. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  9. FireEye. (2020, December 13). Highly Evasive Attacker Leverages SolarWinds Supply Chain to Compromise Multiple Global Victims With SUNBURST Backdoor. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  10. Nafisi, R., Lelli, A. (2021, March 4). GoldMax, GoldFinder, and Sibot: Analyzing NOBELIUM’s layered persistence. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
  11. CrowdStrike Intelligence Team. (2021, January 11). SUNSPOT: An Implant in the Build Process. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  12. Cash, D. et al. (2020, December 14). Dark Halo Leverages SolarWinds Compromise to Breach Organizations. Retrieved December 29, 2020.
  13. NCSC, CISA, FBI, NSA. (2021, May 7). Further TTPs associated with SVR cyber actors. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
  14. Unit 42. (2020, December 23). SolarStorm Supply Chain Attack Timeline. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  15. Secureworks CTU. (n.d.). IRON RITUAL. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  16. Secureworks CTU. (n.d.). IRON HEMLOCK. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
  17. Guerrero-Saade, J. (2021, June 1). NobleBaron | New Poisoned Installers Could Be Used In Supply Chain Attacks. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  18. Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC). (2021, May 27). New sophisticated email-based attack from NOBELIUM. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  19. MSTIC. (2021, May 28). Breaking down NOBELIUM’s latest early-stage toolset. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  20. MSRC. (2021, June 25). New Nobelium activity. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  21. Microsoft Defender Research Team. (2018, December 3). Analysis of cyberattack on U.S. think tanks, non-profits, public sector by unidentified attackers. Retrieved April 15, 2019.
  22. Faou, M., Tartare, M., Dupuy, T. (2019, October). OPERATION GHOST. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
  23. National Cyber Security Centre. (2020, July 16). Advisory: APT29 targets COVID-19 vaccine development. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  24. CrowdStrike. (2022, January 27). Early Bird Catches the Wormhole: Observations from the StellarParticle Campaign. Retrieved February 7, 2022.
  25. PWC. (2020, July 16). How WellMess malware has been used to target COVID-19 vaccines. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  26. PWC. (2020, August 17). WellMess malware: analysis of its Command and Control (C2) server. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  27. Mandiant. (2022, May 2). UNC3524: Eye Spy on Your Email. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
  28. Microsoft . (2023, July 12). How Microsoft names threat actors. Retrieved November 17, 2023.
  29. Mandiant. (2020, April 27). Assembling the Russian Nesting Doll: UNC2452 Merged into APT29. Retrieved March 26, 2023.
  1. Dunwoody, M. and Carr, N.. (2016, September 27). No Easy Breach DerbyCon 2016. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  2. Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center. (2021, October 25). NOBELIUM targeting delegated administrative privileges to facilitate broader attacks. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
  3. MSRC. (2020, December 13). Customer Guidance on Recent Nation-State Cyber Attacks. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
  4. Douglas Bienstock. (2022, August 18). You Can’t Audit Me: APT29 Continues Targeting Microsoft 365. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  5. UK National Cyber Security Center et al. (2024, February). SVR cyber actors adapt tactics for initial cloud access. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  6. Smith, L., Leathery, J., Read, B. (2021, March 4). New SUNSHUTTLE Second-Stage Backdoor Uncovered Targeting U.S.-Based Entity; Possible Connection to UNC2452. Retrieved March 12, 2021.
  7. FireEye Labs. (2015, July). HAMMERTOSS: Stealthy Tactics Define a Russian Cyber Threat Group. Retrieved September 17, 2015.
  8. MSTIC, CDOC, 365 Defender Research Team. (2021, January 20). Deep dive into the Solorigate second-stage activation: From SUNBURST to TEARDROP and Raindrop . Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  9. Symantec Security Response. (2015, July 13). “Forkmeiamfamous”: Seaduke, latest weapon in the Duke armory. Retrieved July 22, 2015.
  10. ESET. (2022, February). THREAT REPORT T3 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  11. MSTIC. (2020, December 18). Analyzing Solorigate, the compromised DLL file that started a sophisticated cyberattack, and how Microsoft Defender helps protect customers . Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  12. ANSSI. (2021, December 6). PHISHING CAMPAIGNS BY THE NOBELIUM INTRUSION SET. Retrieved April 13, 2022.
  13. MSRC Team. (2021, February 18). Microsoft Internal Solorigate Investigation – Final Update. Retrieved May 14, 2021.
  14. Symantec Threat Hunter Team. (2021, January 18). Raindrop: New Malware Discovered in SolarWinds Investigation. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  15. Microsoft 365 Defender Team. (2020, December 28). Using Microsoft 365 Defender to protect against Solorigate. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  16. Dunwoody, M. (2017, March 27). APT29 Domain Fronting With TOR. Retrieved March 27, 2017.
  17. Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center, Microsoft Detection and Response Team, Microsoft 365 Defender Research Team . (2022, August 24). MagicWeb: NOBELIUM’s post-compromise trick to authenticate as anyone. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
  18. Luke Jenkins, Sarah Hawley, Parnian Najafi, Doug Bienstock. (2021, December 6). Suspected Russian Activity Targeting Government and Business Entities Around the Globe. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
  19. Secureworks CTU. (2021, May 28). USAID-Themed Phishing Campaign Leverages U.S. Elections Lure. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  20. Mandiant. (2022, August). Remediation and Hardening Strategies for Microsoft 365 to Defend Against APT29. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
  21. Wolfram, J. et al. (2022, April 28). Trello From the Other Side: Tracking APT29 Phishing Campaigns. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
  22. Sudhakar Ramakrishna . (2021, January 11). New Findings From Our Investigation of SUNBURST. Retrieved January 13, 2021.
  23. Ramin Nafisi. (2021, September 27). FoggyWeb: Targeted NOBELIUM malware leads to persistent backdoor. Retrieved October 4, 2021.
  24. CISA. (2020, July 16). MAR-10296782-1.v1 – SOREFANG. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  25. Dunwoody, M.. (2017, April 3). Dissecting One of APT29’s Fileless WMI and PowerShell Backdoors (POSHSPY). Retrieved April 5, 2017.
  26. Adair, S.. (2016, November 9). PowerDuke: Widespread Post-Election Spear Phishing Campaigns Targeting Think Tanks and NGOs. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  27. CISA. (2020, July 16). MAR-10296782-3.v1 – WELLMAIL. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  28. CISA. (2020, July 16). MAR-10296782-2.v1 – WELLMESS. Retrieved September 24, 2020.